
Protect your city
From Durban to Today: How BDS Turns Local Councils into Weapons Against Israel
In 1997, the United Nations announced it would host a global conference for NGOs to combat racism. The Tehran Preparatory Conference for the 2001 World Conference Against Racism (WCAR) took place in Tehran, Iran. Israel wasn’t invited.
The conference took place in Durban in 2001. Instead of uniting around human rights, it evolved into a festival of hate. More than 1,500 NGOs adopted a strategy to single out Israel, labeling it an apartheid, genocidal, colonialist state.
Out of this campaign, the BDS movement was formally launched in 2005, with its headquarters in Ramallah, Hamas sitting on its board, and Hamas alumni in key managerial roles. It was fueled by money and goodwill generated by the Oslo Accords. From the outset, BDS has lobbied municipalities worldwide to take measures against Israel. Dozens of local authorities in the US, Ireland, Norway, Spain, Sweden, France, the UK, Italy, Belgium, and Australia have passed resolutions supporting BDS or pledging to discriminate against, exclude, and boycott Israel and companies that do business with it.
BDS is not a protest against Israeli policies, nor does it seek to improve the lives of Palestinians. It is an aggressive disinformation campaign with one objective: the destruction of the Jewish state. Along the way, it harms cities, Jews and Arabs alike.
Since late 2023, in the wake of the Gaza war, more municipalities have adopted measures to discriminate against and divest from Israel or to distance themselves from companies doing business there. BDS markets these decisions as “acts of solidarity,” or as support for a peace or ecological economy, but in reality, they amount to economic coercion and unlawful discrimination.
The economic fallout can be severe. In 2015, for example, the French corporation Veolia sold its Israeli operations, including its stake in the Jerusalem Light Rail project. According to BDS reports, Veolia lost contracts worth at least $20 billion due to municipal pressure. This case illustrates how BDS weaponizes local governments to inflict economic harm on companies engaged in lawful business with Israel and to drive bottom-up pressure for changes in national policy. Acting as a Trojan horse, the movement infiltrates cities, gaining influence to undermine Western institutions and advance the goal of establishing a global caliphate.
BDS pivots between several campaigns. Here are some of the actions they lead in your city hall:
-
A “twin city” agreement is a legal loophole, allowing the transfer of people, money, and goods between Hamas and your city. In practice, this means your tax dollars could end up in Hamas’s pockets instead of being used to fix roads or schools. It also opens the door for Hamas operatives to enter your city and exert influence over your city hall.
-
Asking for a ceasefire while simultaneously launching an attack is a familiar jihadist tactic. It is a form of narcissistic manipulation, combining gaslighting with victim-blaming: attacking Israel on October 7 and then portraying themselves as the victims when Israel defends itself. This pattern is not new. For example, what they call the Nakba in 1948 was actually a war launched against Israel by five armies. More recently, during the Druze massacre in Syria, perpetrators spread false claims online that the Druze were the aggressors—an outrageous distortion of reality. This tactic also appears on other fronts, such as in Kashmir with Hindus and in Africa with Christians. Whenever attacks, rapes, killings, or kidnappings occur, jihadists brazenly frame themselves as the victims.
-
BDS often highlights high-profile corporate withdrawals from Israel to portray itself as effective and influential. One widely cited case is Veolia in 2015. BDS claims it forced the company to sell its Israeli operations, including its role in the Jerusalem Light Rail, by pressuring municipalities and causing $20 billion in lost contracts. They also point to G4S scaling back operations in Israel as further proof that local activism can drive multinational companies to retreat.
This narrative is carefully crafted to claim victory, teach activists how to leverage municipal influence, and build momentum by making boycotts appear successful.
-
Divestment doesn’t just mean ending ties with Israel or Israeli companies—it can also create financial losses for your city or pension fund. When a fund is forced to sell investments simply because they are connected, even indirectly, to Israel, it may miss out on profitable opportunities, disrupt carefully balanced portfolios, and reduce overall returns. In other words, divestment policies can harm the city’s finances while targeting companies for political reasons, not economic performance.
-
The “Apartheid Free Zones” (AFZ) initiative is a BDS-led campaign aimed at pressuring cities, organizations, unions, and local businesses to sever ties with Israel and Israeli companies. AFZ presents itself as a movement for justice, but in reality, it is a discriminatory campaign that targets Israel while ignoring comparable situations elsewhere.
Participants pledge to avoid any commercial or institutional relationships with Israel or companies operating there, often under the threat of public pressure or boycotts. Local councils are lobbied to pass resolutions that punish businesses for their lawful activities in Israel.
-
Who wouldn’t want to invest in a “peace economy”? This label masks discrimination as virtue, manipulating well-meaning officials into supporting unjust policies. BDS guides activists to pressure city councils and unions to divest from companies accused of human rights violations—framing broad policies under positive-sounding terms like “peace economy” or “ecological investments.” Examples include New Orleans’ (later rescinded) human rights resolution and Portland’s divestment actions and Do-Not-Buy list.
Take Action
Pass ‘Stay Local’ Resolution
Build Teams
Raise Awareness
Grassroots community organizing has already inspired many local councils to take a decisive stand: supporting their communities by focusing on local priorities, rejecting discrimination, and staying out of international disputes.
Now we need your help to expand this movement. By encouraging more local government bodies to adopt this stance, we can strengthen solidarity within our communities and keep the focus where it belongs—on local wellbeing, inclusion, and unity.
Join us in raising this option: choosing not to take sides in international conflicts, but instead standing firmly with and for the local community.
-
To learn how far BDS has infiltrated your city, start by googling your city name along with “BDS,” “Gaza,” or “Palestine.” Take a moment to review the results and share what you find with your friends.
-
Learn Their Playbook Understand the tactics used by anti-Israel activists. Learn the language—terms like apartheid-free zones, subnationalism, and ESGbased framing. Know how they operate before you respond.
-
Create a grassroots coalition with Jewish, Christian, Muslim, Hindu, and other local communities. Mobilize supporters to speak—or simply show up in solidarity—at council meetings. Twin City is everyone’s problem, not just the Jews.
-
Equip your community with consistent talking points and prepared speeches (even AI-generated). Focus on:
Stay Local – International conflicts are not the city’s job.
Protect City Finances – Divesting from stable, global companies under political pressure is fiscally irresponsible.
-
Email helps, but physical presence changes outcomes. Fill the room at council meetings. Numbers matter.
Engage Council Members One-on-One
Meet with representatives respectfully. Explain BDS is:
Discriminatory (especially toward Jews and Israelis)
Divisive for your city
Outside the scope of municipal authority
Bring the BDS “toolkit” used in your country to show how these campaigns are pre-planned and replicated across cities. Make clear that council members are being targeted as part of a larger political strategy.
-
Meet with representatives respectfully. Present BDS as:
Discriminatory (especially toward Jews and Israelis)
Divisive for your city
Outside the scope of municipal authority
Bring the BDS “toolkit” used in your country to show how these campaigns are pre-planned and replicated across cities. Make clear that council members are being targeted as part of a larger political strategy.
-
Use Local Laws. Point to anti-discrimination laws that protect people based on ethnicity, religion, or nationality.
Explain how targeting Israel may violate those protections.
What Does A Win Look Like?
Your goal isn’t to “win a debate.” It’s to get your city council to adopt a clear position such as:
“Our city council will not engage in or adopt positions on international conflicts, including the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, as these matters fall outside the scope of municipal governance.”
Such a resolution:
❌ Blocks future BDS-style proposals
🛡️ Shields the city from being drawn into foreign policy debates
🤝 Provides council members with a neutral, non-political reason to avoid divisive votes
📣 Sends a clear message to other cities: “This campaign stops here.”
Win Examples
-
I studied discrimination against Jews, and I want to help by providing some historical context.
The introduction of Resolution 1547 on Yom Kippur continues a dark pattern. There is a long and painful tradition of attacking Jews on their holidays. In Israel, Hamas planned the October 7th attack to coincide with Simchat Torah. It has also sent suicide bombers to target Passover Seders.
Just last week in England, another synagogue was attacked on Yom Kippur. Here in the U.S., for decades, the anti-Zionist playbook in universities, unions, and local governments has involved introducing anti-Israel resolutions on Jewish holidays. The University of Maryland did it again just last week.
If the vote is held on that day, they achieve a “Jew-free” environment to express their hatred. If not, the attack still lands—because the timing itself is an act of targeting. These resolutions claim to be about Israel, but the timing targets Jews locally.
What happened here in Nashville is not a one-off. We already face enough hate—from neo-Nazis marching downtown—we don’t need a Council member weaponizing Metro Council against us. A Council member targeted us by bringing this resolution on Yom Kippur.
We went to the synagogue to pray and arrived to learn that we had been attacked. That is simply cruel. The Council member owes the Nashville Jewish community an apology.
Jewish Nashvillians deserve to be treated with the same dignity and respect as anyone else. I ask you to vote for an indefinite deferral, and I thank you for your openness in hearing my words.
Thank you.
-
I recommend that the committee indefinitely defer the proposed resolution.
First, it is hurtful to the Jewish and Christian people—and to everyone in this community who supports Israel. For two years now, a very loud minority in this country has demonized Israel, and by association, all Jews, for fighting a war that began with the horrific massacre of 1,200 civilians and the kidnapping of 250 hostages. Somehow, the murderers and rapists who still hold hostages today have become the “good guys” in this war—and that is unbelievable to me.
Second, if it is truly the responsibility of this Council to debate world affairs, then the business of taking care of our city would be put on hold. Nashville faces enough challenges—public safety, education, and infrastructure among them. Those are more than enough for this Council to focus on.
Third and finally, this resolution accomplishes nothing. It has no real impact on Gaza one way or the other. It is based on false information and propaganda released by Hamas and repeated faithfully across social and mainstream media.
John Spencer, a professor at West Point and an expert on urban warfare, has written extensively about how the IDF has gone to great lengths to minimize civilian casualties. He also said that if Israel is committing genocide, it must be the worst attempt in history—since Israel has provided millions of meals and medical aid to Gaza’s population, which, by the way, has actually increased in the last two years.
Ladies and gentlemen, I urge you to indefinitely defer this proposal.
Thank you.
-
Members of the committee, thank you for the opportunity to speak. Since the October 7th massacre, I have traveled to Israel multiple times—meeting with hostage families, survivors, and hostages themselves; attending briefings with Israeli civil and military leadership; and working closely with national Jewish organizations here in the United States. I urge the committee to vote for an indefinite deferral.
This resolution addresses the actions of a foreign government—a matter entirely outside the business of this Council. Since October 7th, the “genocide” lie has been resurrected as a tool of political propaganda. There is a tactic behind this called political DARVO—Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender. This resolution follows that exact pattern. It denies the genocidal massacre Israel faced on October 7th. It denies Hamas’s stated goal to eliminate the Jewish state. It attacks Israel for defending its citizens. And it reverses the roles of victim and offender in this conflict.
Victims do not start wars. Victims do not hold hostages. And victims do not write this resolution. The resolution cites journalists as sources, yet some of those same journalists were complicit in the October 7th attacks. For example, Hamas members who were holding hostages included freelance journalist Musa al-Nazzar, who filmed the abduction of two babies, and Abdullah al-Jamal, an Al Jazeera journalist, who was found holding three Israeli hostages in his own home.
The claim of genocide ignores both law and fact. Under international law, genocide requires the intent and action to destroy a people. Israel meets neither condition. Its intent is clear: to defeat Hamas and return the hostages. Israel has delivered more humanitarian aid to an enemy population during wartime than any nation in history. Over 109,000 trucks, carrying 2.1 million tons of aid, have entered Gaza.
This resolution mirrors one that was withdrawn last year—originating from one of the largest BDS organizations in North America, a campaign that seeks to isolate and eliminate Israel. Hamas wages war with rockets and terror; BDS wages political war through local councils like this one.
Once again, I urge the committee to indefinitely defer this resolution.
Thank you for your time.
-
I am an American and a proud member of Nashville’s Jewish community.
The resolution proposed by Councilmember Welsh is deeply misguided. The Council’s duty is to serve the people of Nashville—not to pass divisive political judgments on conflicts happening thousands of miles away.
Only the International Court of Justice has the authority to determine whether genocide has occurred. It has not found Israel guilty, and that case is still ongoing. Declaring otherwise is not only premature—it’s misleading.
The timing of this resolution has already been discussed. It is both intentional and cruel. Even here in Nashville, we’ve seen disturbing trends—Nazi marches on the far right, and protests on the far left calling to “globalize the intifada.” These are not abstract threats. They are real fears our community faces.
Nashville should be united against hatred. Yet this resolution singles out the world’s only Jewish state with false and inflammatory claims—while ignoring atrocities in places like Sudan, Syria, Turkey, Yemen, China, and Nigeria.
That double standard is not fair—and to many, it feels antisemitic at its core.
Our duty is to indefinitely defer this resolution and keep our attention where it belongs: on making Nashville a safer, stronger, and more united city for everyone.
-
-
Protect your city presentation
-
Toolkit #1
-
Toolkit #2
-
Toolkit #3
-
protéger votre ville
-
The Sword Of Gideon
-
Local Strategy
-
Join our Spark community